On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:28:12AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > > What is the plan for this series? > > > > We are currently discussing locking changes that might affect 2/3, but > > I'd still consider this patch and the overall series as an improvement > > over the current status (1/3 is a fix to the code) and I'd really like > > future changes to be based on this series... > > > > I expected this series to go via "-rcu -> tip -> ..."; 2/3 had Peter's > > Ack, but 1/3 and 3/3 are missing any comments (or tags): please let me > > know if any action on the series is required from me (the series still > > applies on the latest "dev" branch of -rcu). > > You can add my ack: > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > to the others as well, they look like a definite improvement. I'm fine > with these going through Paul's tree, Ingo? I have pulled them in and will submit them to the upcoming merge window, thank you all! If someone else would prefer to take them, just let me know. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
