Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched/locking/doc: Miscellaneous fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 12:28:12AM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> What is the plan for this series?
> 
> We are currently discussing locking changes that might affect 2/3, but
> I'd still consider this patch and the overall series as an improvement
> over the current status (1/3 is a fix to the code) and I'd really like
> future changes to be based on this series...
> 
> I expected this series to go via "-rcu -> tip -> ..."; 2/3 had Peter's
> Ack, but 1/3 and 3/3 are missing any comments (or tags): please let me
> know if any action on the series is required from me (the series still
> applies on the latest "dev" branch of -rcu).

You can add my ack:

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

to the others as well, they look like a definite improvement. I'm fine
with these going through Paul's tree, Ingo?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux