On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > Hi, > > This is a follow-up on the discussion started in [1]. > > Applies on -rcu/dev. > > Cheers, > Andrea > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529918258-7295-1-git-send-email-andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Andrea Parri (3): > sched: Use smp_mb() in wake_woken_function() > locking: Clarify requirements for smp_mb__after_spinlock() > doc: Update wake_up() & co. memory-barrier guarantees What is the plan for this series? We are currently discussing locking changes that might affect 2/3, but I'd still consider this patch and the overall series as an improvement over the current status (1/3 is a fix to the code) and I'd really like future changes to be based on this series... I expected this series to go via "-rcu -> tip -> ..."; 2/3 had Peter's Ack, but 1/3 and 3/3 are missing any comments (or tags): please let me know if any action on the series is required from me (the series still applies on the latest "dev" branch of -rcu). Andrea > > Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > include/linux/sched.h | 4 +-- > include/linux/spinlock.h | 25 ++---------------- > kernel/sched/completion.c | 8 +++--- > kernel/sched/core.c | 30 +++++++++------------ > kernel/sched/wait.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.7.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
