On 04/21/2016 09:23 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0800
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer
wanted to say here.
*it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions
of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way*
equals
*it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think.
So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in
an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong?
The original author, clearly, was talking about the degradation being
unacceptable. It seems clear enough, I don't think that change should be
made.
Thanks, will remove the change in v2
--
Yours Sincerely,
Cao jin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
