On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0800 Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer > > wanted to say here. > > > *it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions > of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way* > > equals > > *it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think. > > So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in > an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong? The original author, clearly, was talking about the degradation being unacceptable. It seems clear enough, I don't think that change should be made. Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
