On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 02:49:20PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 20 October 2015 at 07:05, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Linus Walleij > >> <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Err, what? > >>>> > >>>> $ git log --merges --grep='Pull.*\(Herring\|Likely\)' --oneline > >>>> Documentation/devicetree/ > >>> > >>> OK nice, bad research from me. My sloppy statement was > >>> based on this: > >>> > >>> OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE > >>> M: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> M: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> M: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> L: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> W: http://www.devicetree.org/ > >>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glikely/linux.git > >>> S: Maintained > >>> F: drivers/of/ > >>> F: include/linux/of*.h > >>> F: scripts/dtc/ > >>> > >>>> The DT core code and bindings (which don't go thru subsystem trees) go > >>>> together. > >>> > >>> I guess I should just send a patch adding > >>> > >>> F: Documentation/devicetree/* > >>> > >>> ...and hope things get better from that. > >> > >> Ah yeah now I also woke up properly... so there is a special group of people > >> listed under another heading for this, and I should know that, mea culpa. > >> > >> OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS > >> M: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> M: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> > >> M: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > >> M: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> M: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> L: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> S: Maintained > >> F: Documentation/devicetree/ > >> F: arch/*/boot/dts/ > >> F: include/dt-bindings/ > >> > >> So can we add your git tree as T: here and replace Grant's tree in > >> the overall DT entry above it? > > > > I would hold off. We've not sorted out our workflow yet and may move > > to a shared repo. > > With respect to this patch, I wonder if someone in the 'circle of > trust' might draw up a patch to handle skipping init and specifying > the input the clock speed? A little bit of progress might go a long > way. Or at least "yes, if you do it $this way, we'll take it".. ? -- Tom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
