On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The MAINTAINERS entry for device tree bindings does not state a >> git tree and I've never seen any of the maintainers send a pull request for >> DT binding files. (Beat me up properly if you have, guys.) I've seen >> Grant send some at times. > > Err, what? > > $ git log --merges --grep='Pull.*\(Herring\|Likely\)' --oneline > Documentation/devicetree/ OK nice, bad research from me. My sloppy statement was based on this: OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE M: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> M: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> M: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> L: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx W: http://www.devicetree.org/ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glikely/linux.git S: Maintained F: drivers/of/ F: include/linux/of*.h F: scripts/dtc/ > The DT core code and bindings (which don't go thru subsystem trees) go > together. I guess I should just send a patch adding F: Documentation/devicetree/* ...and hope things get better from that. >> I suggest sending U-Boot DT bindings to not only >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> but also, as indicated, to Jon Corbet and linux-doc. > > I'd suggest devicetree-spec@vger for common things. Perhaps we need a > better name, but the whole point of this was to separate the common > issues from the firehose and have multiple OS participation. Hm, wasn't devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx supposed to be for that? >> If noone cares to comment in two weeks, Jon can merge them, >> breaking the status quo on external DT bindings. > > Did someone tell Jon to drink from that firehose? I'm sorry, I guess this whole mail was something I wrote in light panic over the increasing threat from the separatists. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
