On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Pranith Kumar wrote: > > then we have on x86 a increment operation with locked semantics racing > > with an unlocked one on the same cacheline. > OK, I will add this as a warning in the documentation. Thanks! Note that I have not been able to get beyond a bad feeling. Looked up various sources of information about how the lock prefix works. Still I am not sure if this works or not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
