On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 09:32AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > On 03/10/2014 11:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 12:58PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > >> On 03/10/2014 11:56 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>> On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 02:57:16AM +0000, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote: > >>>> Added EDAC support for reporting the ecc errors of zynq ddr controller. > >>>> The ddr ecc controller corrects single bit errors and detects double bit > >>>> errors > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/edac/zynq_edac.txt | 18 + > >>>> drivers/edac/Kconfig | 7 + > >>>> drivers/edac/Makefile | 1 + > >>>> drivers/edac/zynq_edac.c | 613 ++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> 4 files changed, 639 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/zynq_edac.txt > >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/edac/zynq_edac.c > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/zynq_edac.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/zynq_edac.txt > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 0000000..c21ff83 > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/zynq_edac.txt > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > >>>> +Zynq EDAC driver, it does reports the DDR ECC single bit errors that are > >>>> +corrected and double bit ecc errors that are detected by the DDR ECC controller. > >>>> +ECC support for DDR is available in half-bus width(16 bit) configuration only. > >>>> + > >>>> +Required properties: > >>>> +- compatible: Should be "xlnx,ps7-ddrc" or "xlnx,ps7-ddrc-1.00.a" > >>> > >>> Is this an or or a xor? > >> > >> Compatible string should be just xlnx,zynq-ddrc-1.00.a. > >> Nothing with ps7. > > > > Isn't this vendor IP? IMHO, this should be something completely > > different. Or if you want some Zynq-specific compat string it should > > refer to an actual version string associated with Zynq. 1.00.a is not, > > AFAIK. > > I have checked with Punnaiah that this is Synopsys DDR memory controller. > Zynq is based on 1.4 version with some customization. > It means I think reasonable solution is > call it drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c > rename zynq_ in driver to synopsys_ and > use xlnx,zynq-ddrc-1.00.a compatible string because zynq is not using > clean synopsys version. > > I am not getting point why you don't like 1.00.a suffix here. > Because of historical point of view compatible strings should be different > for early silicon, silicon v1, silicon v2, silicon v3, etc > but we haven't used it at all that's why we can use xilinx scheme > which we are using for our soft IPs. Well, but you refer to Zynq which has silicon revisions you can use to refer to a specific Zynq version. That matches data sheets. Zynq-1.00.a is just completely made up and wouldn't be found in any data sheet. Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html