Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> writes: > Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> When it was in text format, it correctly hardcoded steps 8a to 8c. >> However, after it was converted to RST, the sequence numbers were >> auto-generated during rendering and became incorrect after some >> steps were inserted. >> >> Change it to refer to steps a to c in a relative way. >> >> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst >> index efde1fef4fbd..562d1bc6d448 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst >> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ vma occurs? >> c) execution continues at local label 2 (address of the >> instruction immediately after the faulting user access). >> >> -The steps 8a to 8c in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction. >> +The steps a to c above in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction. >> > > Those steps render as 1, 2, and 3 ... where did "a to c" come from? Ah, I see where my confusion came from. The fix is obvious: indent the line that was changed so that it is a part of the bulleted item it's talking about. I've applied your patch with that change. Thanks, jon
