When it was in text format, it correctly hardcoded steps 8a to 8c.
However, after it was converted to RST, the sequence numbers were
auto-generated during rendering and became incorrect after some
steps were inserted.
Change it to refer to steps a to c in a relative way.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst
index efde1fef4fbd..562d1bc6d448 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ vma occurs?
c) execution continues at local label 2 (address of the
instruction immediately after the faulting user access).
-The steps 8a to 8c in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction.
+The steps a to c above in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction.
That's it, mostly. If you look at our example, you might ask why
we set EAX to -EFAULT in the exception handler code. Well, the
--
2.29.2
