Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > When it was in text format, it correctly hardcoded steps 8a to 8c. > However, after it was converted to RST, the sequence numbers were > auto-generated during rendering and became incorrect after some > steps were inserted. > > Change it to refer to steps a to c in a relative way. > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst > index efde1fef4fbd..562d1bc6d448 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ vma occurs? > c) execution continues at local label 2 (address of the > instruction immediately after the faulting user access). > > -The steps 8a to 8c in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction. > +The steps a to c above in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction. > Those steps render as 1, 2, and 3 ... where did "a to c" come from? Thanks, jon
