Hi Peter, On 4/3/2024 5:30 PM, Peter Newman wrote: ... > > Presumably this would be called holding the rdtgroup_mutex? Perhaps a > lockdep assertion somewhere would be appropriate? > Considering that you are digging into the implementation already, can it be assumed that you approve (while considering how "soft RMID" may build on this) of the new interface as described in the cover letter? Reinette
