Hi Reinette, On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 11:43 AM Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > On 4/3/2024 5:30 PM, Peter Newman wrote: > > ... > > > > Presumably this would be called holding the rdtgroup_mutex? Perhaps a > > lockdep assertion somewhere would be appropriate? > > > > Considering that you are digging into the implementation already, can > it be assumed that you approve (while considering how "soft RMID" may > build on this) of the new interface as described in the cover letter? Yes, I believe we came back to an agreement when discussing the last series. I'll look over the cover letter in this series just to make sure everything is there. -Peter
