Re: [net-next v3 2/2] mlx5/core: Support max_io_eqs for a function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-04-04 11:05, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
>> From: David Wei <dw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 10:27 PM
>>
>> On 2024-04-03 10:41, Parav Pandit wrote:
>>> Implement get and set for the maximum IO event queues for SF and VF.
>>> This enables administrator on the hypervisor to control the maximum IO
>>> event queues which are typically used to derive the maximum and
>>> default number of net device channels or rdma device completion vectors.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> changelog:
>>> v2->v3:
>>> - limited to 80 chars per line in devlink
>>> - fixed comments from Jakub in mlx5 driver to fix missing mutex unlock
>>>   on error path
>>> v1->v2:
>>> - fixed comments from Kalesh
>>> - fixed missing kfree in get call
>>> - returning error code for get cmd failure
>>> - fixed error msg copy paste error in set on cmd failure
>>> - limited code to 80 chars limit
>>> - fixed set function variables for reverse christmas tree
>>> ---
>>>  .../mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c     |  4 +
>>>  .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h |  7 ++
>>>  .../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c     | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c
>>> index d8e739cbcbce..f8869c9b6802 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/devlink_port.c
>>> @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static const struct devlink_port_ops
>> mlx5_esw_pf_vf_dl_port_ops = {
>>>  	.port_fn_ipsec_packet_get =
>> mlx5_devlink_port_fn_ipsec_packet_get,
>>>  	.port_fn_ipsec_packet_set =
>> mlx5_devlink_port_fn_ipsec_packet_set,
>>>  #endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
>>> +	.port_fn_max_io_eqs_get = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_get,
>>> +	.port_fn_max_io_eqs_set = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_set,
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static void mlx5_esw_offloads_sf_devlink_port_attrs_set(struct
>>> mlx5_eswitch *esw, @@ -143,6 +145,8 @@ static const struct
>> devlink_port_ops mlx5_esw_dl_sf_port_ops = {
>>>  	.port_fn_state_get = mlx5_devlink_sf_port_fn_state_get,
>>>  	.port_fn_state_set = mlx5_devlink_sf_port_fn_state_set,
>>>  #endif
>>> +	.port_fn_max_io_eqs_get = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_get,
>>> +	.port_fn_max_io_eqs_set = mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_set,
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  int mlx5_esw_offloads_devlink_port_register(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
>>> struct mlx5_vport *vport) diff --git
>>> a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>>> index 349e28a6dd8d..50ce1ea20dd4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>>> @@ -573,6 +573,13 @@ int mlx5_devlink_port_fn_ipsec_packet_get(struct
>>> devlink_port *port, bool *is_en  int
>> mlx5_devlink_port_fn_ipsec_packet_set(struct devlink_port *port, bool
>> enable,
>>>  					  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> #endif /*
>>> CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
>>> +int mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_get(struct devlink_port *port,
>>> +					u32 *max_io_eqs,
>>> +					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack); int
>>> +mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_set(struct devlink_port *port,
>>> +					u32 max_io_eqs,
>>> +					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>> +
>>>  void *mlx5_eswitch_get_uplink_priv(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8
>>> rep_type);
>>>
>>>  int __mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_vlan(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, diff
>>> --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>>> index baaae628b0a0..2ad50634b401 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>>> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
>>>
>>>  #define MLX5_ESW_FT_OFFLOADS_DROP_RULE (1)
>>>
>>> +#define MLX5_ESW_MAX_CTRL_EQS 4
>>> +
>>>  static struct esw_vport_tbl_namespace mlx5_esw_vport_tbl_mirror_ns = {
>>>  	.max_fte = MLX5_ESW_VPORT_TBL_SIZE,
>>>  	.max_num_groups = MLX5_ESW_VPORT_TBL_NUM_GROUPS, @@ -
>> 4557,3 +4559,98
>>> @@ int mlx5_devlink_port_fn_ipsec_packet_set(struct devlink_port *port,
>>>  	return err;
>>>  }
>>>  #endif /* CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD */
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_get(struct devlink_port *port, u32
>> *max_io_eqs,
>>> +				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) {
>>> +	struct mlx5_vport *vport = mlx5_devlink_port_vport_get(port);
>>> +	int query_out_sz = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(query_hca_cap_out);
>>> +	u16 vport_num = vport->vport;
>>> +	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw;
>>> +	void *query_ctx;
>>> +	void *hca_caps;
>>> +	u32 max_eqs;
>>> +	int err;
>>> +
>>> +	esw = mlx5_devlink_eswitch_nocheck_get(port->devlink);
>>> +	if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_resource_manager)) {
>>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>>> +				   "Device doesn't support VHCA
>> management");
>>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	query_ctx = kzalloc(query_out_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!query_ctx)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&esw->state_lock);
>>> +	err = mlx5_vport_get_other_func_cap(esw->dev, vport_num,
>> query_ctx,
>>> +					    MLX5_CAP_GENERAL);
>>> +	if (err) {
>>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed getting HCA caps");
>>> +		goto out;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	hca_caps = MLX5_ADDR_OF(query_hca_cap_out, query_ctx,
>> capability);
>>> +	max_eqs = MLX5_GET(cmd_hca_cap, hca_caps, max_num_eqs);
>>> +	if (max_eqs < MLX5_ESW_MAX_CTRL_EQS)
>>> +		*max_io_eqs = 0;
>>> +	else
>>> +		*max_io_eqs = max_eqs - MLX5_ESW_MAX_CTRL_EQS;
>>> +out:
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&esw->state_lock);
>>> +	kfree(query_ctx);
>>> +	return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +mlx5_devlink_port_fn_max_io_eqs_set(struct devlink_port *port, u32
>> max_io_eqs,
>>> +				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) {
>>> +	struct mlx5_vport *vport = mlx5_devlink_port_vport_get(port);
>>> +	int query_out_sz = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(query_hca_cap_out);
>>> +	u16 max_eqs = max_io_eqs + MLX5_ESW_MAX_CTRL_EQS;
>>> +	u16 vport_num = vport->vport;
>>> +	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw;
>>> +	void *query_ctx;
>>> +	void *hca_caps;
>>> +	int err;
>>> +
>>> +	esw = mlx5_devlink_eswitch_nocheck_get(port->devlink);
>>> +	if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vhca_resource_manager)) {
>>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
>>> +				   "Device doesn't support VHCA
>> management");
>>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (max_io_eqs + MLX5_ESW_MAX_CTRL_EQS > USHRT_MAX) {
>>
>> nit: this is the same as max_eqs
>>
> Yes.
> max_eqs may overflow and we may miss the overflow check by reusing max_eqs.
> Above if condition avoids that bug.

Thanks, I missed that max_io_eqs is u32.

> That reminds me that I can replace above max_eqs line and this with check_add_overflow() and store the result in max_io_eqs.
> And save one line. :)
> 
> Shall I resend with this change?
Yes that sounds good, thank you.

> 
>>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Supplied value out of
>> range");
>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	query_ctx = kzalloc(query_out_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +	if (!query_ctx)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	mutex_lock(&esw->state_lock);
>>> +	err = mlx5_vport_get_other_func_cap(esw->dev, vport_num,
>> query_ctx,
>>> +					    MLX5_CAP_GENERAL);
>>> +	if (err) {
>>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed getting HCA caps");
>>> +		goto out;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	hca_caps = MLX5_ADDR_OF(query_hca_cap_out, query_ctx,
>> capability);
>>> +	MLX5_SET(cmd_hca_cap, hca_caps, max_num_eqs, max_eqs);
>>> +
>>> +	err = mlx5_vport_set_other_func_cap(esw->dev, hca_caps,
>> vport_num,
>>> +
>> MLX5_SET_HCA_CAP_OP_MOD_GENERAL_DEVICE);
>>> +	if (err)
>>> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed setting HCA caps");
>>> +
>>> +out:
>>> +	mutex_unlock(&esw->state_lock);
>>> +	kfree(query_ctx);
>>> +	return err;
>>> +}




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux