On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 07:11:17PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:48 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For instance, to disable the compressed instructions, from what I can > tell, the flag I mentioned seems to work, so that is fine. To me, using flags is a good fit given that's what we do elsewhere, and there won't be a mix of stuff that is done conditionally in a script and conditionally in a Makefile. > However, > for something like tweaking the data layout for `n64` instead of > `n32:64`, I am not aware of a way to do so via a flag (but I see newer > LLVM uses `n32:64`, so that may be the better one anyway: > https://godbolt.org/z/Eh4cfdeMr). Yeah, I had looked at the blame for the targets earlier today and noticed that it had been changed. Sadly rustc's commit is lacking any justification whatsoever for the change, so I was not going to really comment on that until I had looked. > So it all depends on whether you are happy with what the flags > approach already give you. > > I hope that clarifies a bit! Ye, thanks. I'll give it a go when I have a bit of time this week.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
