On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:46:42AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:17 AM Conor Dooley > <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Sure, I'll take a look. > > Thanks! > > > Nah, I think that is silly. Either this goes in as-is, and there's > > fixup done by Linus, or the thing should be converted to match arm64, > > assuming that that is possible. > > Ah, so you are going for 6.9 too? I can give the series a try on my > side in that case. When do you plan to apply them? If they're to be applied, it would be Palmer, not I. And if history is any guide, it could be into the merge window. My point though was more that either this was acceptable for v6.9 or would be v6.10 material with the same mechanism as arm64. Rebasing after v6.9-rc1 but not adapting to that way of doing things is what seemed silly to me, since if a resend is required then the other improvements should be carried out at the same time. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
