On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:12:51PM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:05 PM Conor Dooley > <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > My point though was more > > that either this was acceptable for v6.9 or would be v6.10 material > > with the same mechanism as arm64. Rebasing after v6.9-rc1 but not > > adapting to that way of doing things is what seemed silly to me, since > > if a resend is required then the other improvements should be carried > > out at the same time. > > If avoiding the `target.json` is possible, definitely. > > I didn't want to assume it is, though -- e.g. the native integer > widths you have is 64 but the built-in targets use 32:64 (perhaps > there is a way to tweak it with an LLVM param via `-Cllvm-args`, but I > don't see any obvious way from a quick look; `opt` does have it, > though). Looking closer at those targets, all of them enable compressed instructors, but we support hardware that does not support them. I think that means we are stuck with the custom targets. I could badger Palmer to pick this up tomorrow, provided you're okay with the gist of this series. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
