Hi Tony, On 1/30/24 16:20, Tony Luck wrote: > This is the re-worked version of this series that I promised to post > yesterday. Check that e-mail for the arguments for this alternate > approach. To be honest, I like this series more than the previous series. I always thought RDT_RESOURCE_L3_MON should have been a separate resource by itself. You need to separate the domain lists for RDT_RESOURCE_L3 and RDT_RESOURCE_L3_MON if you are going this route. I didn't see that in this series. Also I have few other comments as well. Thanks Babu
