On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 09:27:56AM -0600, Moger, Babu wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On 1/30/24 16:20, Tony Luck wrote: > > This is the re-worked version of this series that I promised to post > > yesterday. Check that e-mail for the arguments for this alternate > > approach. > > To be honest, I like this series more than the previous series. I always > thought RDT_RESOURCE_L3_MON should have been a separate resource by itself. > > You need to separate the domain lists for RDT_RESOURCE_L3 and > RDT_RESOURCE_L3_MON if you are going this route. I didn't see that in this > series. Also I have few other comments as well. They are separated. Each "struct rdt_resource" has its own domain list. Or do you mean break up the struct rdt_domain into the control and monitor versions as was done in the previous series? > > Thanks > Babu >
