June 24, 2023 8:40 AM, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:38:21 +0200 Petr Tesařík <petr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, 15 May 2023 11:23:27 +0000 >> "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> May 15, 2023 5:49 PM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > This looks fine to me. Can you please work with Barry to make sure > the slight different place of the initcall doesn't break anything > for his setup? I doubt it would, but I'd rather have a Tested-by: > tag. >> Barry's email is no longer in use. I can't reach him. >> >> Which one? I would hope that his Gmail account is still valid: >> >> Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> > > Maybe his kernel.org address works... > > I have this patch stuck in limbo for 6.4. I guess I'll carry it over > into the next -rc cycle, see what happens. > > fwiw, it has been in -next for six weeks, no known issues. Hi, Barry, The slight different place of the initcall, does break anything?
