Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:38:21 +0200 Petr Tesařík <petr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 May 2023 11:23:27 +0000
> "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > May 15, 2023 5:49 PM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > This looks fine to me. Can you please work with Barry to make sure
> > > the slight different place of the initcall doesn't break anything
> > > for his setup? I doubt it would, but I'd rather have a Tested-by:
> > > tag.  
> > 
> > Barry's email is no longer in use. I can't reach him.
> 
> Which one? I would hope that his Gmail account is still valid:
> 
>   Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
> 

Maybe his kernel.org address works...

I have this patch stuck in limbo for 6.4.  I guess I'll carry it over
into the next -rc cycle, see what happens.

fwiw, it has been in -next for six weeks, no known issues.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux