Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 11:49:55 +0200
Cc: corbet@xxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx, robin.murphy@xxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kim.phillips@xxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx, ardb@xxxxxxxxxx, bhe@xxxxxxxxxx, anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx, song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230512094210.141540-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
References: <20230512094210.141540-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

This looks fine to me.  Can you please work with Barry to make sure
the slight different place of the initcall doesn't break anything
for his setup?  I doubt it would, but I'd rather have a Tested-by:
tag.

References:
- [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures
  - From: Yajun Deng

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduce cmpxchg128() -- aka. the demise of cmpxchg_double()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] iommu/dma: s390 DMA API conversion and optimized IOTLB flushing
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux