Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:53:36PM CEST, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: >> I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going >> on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example: >> 1) mode_set op removal >> 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok - >> that's the unfinished discussion) >> 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds >> reasonable, yet nothing changed >> >> I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and >> over? > >FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in >refreshing the series. > >But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of >outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover >letter. Well I would like to conclude discussion in one thread before sending the next one. What should I do? Should I start the same discussion pointing out the same issues in this thread again? This can't work. Even concluded items are ignored, like 3) IDK, this is very frustrating for me. I have to double check everything just in case it was not ignored. I don't understand this, there is no justification.
