Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 02:38:10PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >Implement common API for clock/DPLL configuration and status reporting. >The API utilises netlink interface as transport for commands and event >notifications. This API aim to extend current pin configuration and >make it flexible and easy to cover special configurations. > >Netlink interface is based on ynl spec, it allows use of in-kernel >tools/net/ynl/cli.py application to control the interface with properly >formated command and json attribute strings. Here are few command >examples of how it works with `ice` driver on supported NIC: I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example: 1) mode_set op removal 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok - that's the unfinished discussion) 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds reasonable, yet nothing changed I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and over?
