On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: > I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going > on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example: > 1) mode_set op removal > 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok - > that's the unfinished discussion) > 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds > reasonable, yet nothing changed > > I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and > over? FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in refreshing the series. But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover letter.
