> >> How does this interact with the pinctrl driver that Laxman just sent > >> for Palmas? > >> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/26/141 > >> [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: palmas: add pincontrol driver > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. Given this: > > > > +Optional properties: > > +- ti,palams-enable-dvfs1: Enable DVFS1. Configure pins for DVFS1 mode. > > +- ti,palams-enable-dvfs2: Enable DVFS2. Configure pins for DVFS2 mode. > > > > I think his work already encompasses what my patch is supposed to do. > > > > Abandoning this patch. > > OK, that's simple! > > Are the existing ti,mux-pad1/ti,mux-pad2 properties already in the binding > redundant with Laxman's pinctrl driver? In linux-next (where I based my work), yes, those two properties already exist, and as far as I understand it, are redundant with Laxman's pinctrl driver. I expect those properties will go away with Laxman's pinctrl driver. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
