On 07/26/2013 03:28 PM, Andrew Chew wrote: >> On 07/26/2013 02:41 PM, Andrew Chew wrote: >>> There exists a PRIMARY_SECONDARY_PAD3 in the same register base as >>> PRIMARY_SECONDARY_PAD2, which controls the function of certain pins. >>> Add a property for this setting. >> >> How does this interact with the pinctrl driver that Laxman just sent for >> Palmas? >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/26/141 >> [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: palmas: add pincontrol driver > > Thanks for pointing this out. Given this: > > +Optional properties: > +- ti,palams-enable-dvfs1: Enable DVFS1. Configure pins for DVFS1 mode. > +- ti,palams-enable-dvfs2: Enable DVFS2. Configure pins for DVFS2 mode. > > I think his work already encompasses what my patch is supposed to do. > > Abandoning this patch. OK, that's simple! Are the existing ti,mux-pad1/ti,mux-pad2 properties already in the binding redundant with Laxman's pinctrl driver? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
