On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:51:06AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 06/01/2013 03:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> If I were working on this system I'd drop the
> >> snps,arc700-intc node entirely and have a single abilis,tb10x-intc that
> >> encapsulated the properties of both (you would of course want to share
> >> handler functions for the 'normal' inputs without the custom features).
> >> That would eliminate the goofyness of listing 27 separate interrupts in
> >> the abilis,tb10x-ictl interrupts property.
> >
> > But how is this different from other systems with a primary in-core intc and a
> > cascaded external intc. How do they do it. I guess I need to read up more on this.
>
> Usually cascaded irq controllers have multiple irqs multiplexed onto a
> single irq on the parent controller. It's the 1:1 situation that makes
> this controller odd.
You're right, this might be a bit confusing. The controller was mainly
designed as a compatibility layer between ARC770 built-in interrupts and
the rest of the system.
Do you see a better way to drive this kind of hardware? Do you have any
other comments on the driver?
Without this driver, arch/arc/plat-tb10x and related drivers will not
work and it would thus be good to have this in the kernel as quickly as
possible if there are no more issues with it.
Greetings,
Christian
--
Christian Ruppert , <christian.ruppert@xxxxxxxxxx>
/|
Tel: +41/(0)22 816 19-42 //| 3, Chemin du Pré-Fleuri
_// | bilis Systems CH-1228 Plan-les-Ouates
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
