On 9/25/22 10:48, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 9/24/22 20:18, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> On 9/23/22 20:39, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >>>> Shouldn't warning like "This documentation isn't in RST format and included >>>> as literal block" be added? >>> >>> Why? Who needs that information and what will they do with it? >> >> At least readers will not be surprised with the anomaly... >> >> But anyway, for consistency, I'd like to see these *.txt docs be converted >> to proper RST. > > I'm pretty sure that Jonathan knows that those files' owner(s) want them > to remain in txt format. > OK, thanks! -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
