On 9/23/22 20:39, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Shouldn't warning like "This documentation isn't in RST format and included >> as literal block" be added? > > Why? Who needs that information and what will they do with it? At least readers will not be surprised with the anomaly... But anyway, for consistency, I'd like to see these *.txt docs be converted to proper RST. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
