On 9/24/22 20:18, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 9/23/22 20:39, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >>> Shouldn't warning like "This documentation isn't in RST format and included >>> as literal block" be added? >> >> Why? Who needs that information and what will they do with it? > > At least readers will not be surprised with the anomaly... > > But anyway, for consistency, I'd like to see these *.txt docs be converted > to proper RST. I'm pretty sure that Jonathan knows that those files' owner(s) want them to remain in txt format. -- ~Randy
