Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Jon, > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:53:57 +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >> On distros whose texlive packaging is fine-grained, texlive-xecjk >> can be installed/removed independently of other texlive packages. >> Conditionally loading xeCJK depending only on the existence of the >> "Noto Sans CJK SC" font might end up in xelatex error of >> "xeCJK.sty not found!". >> >> Improve the situation by testing existence of xeCJK.sty before >> loading it. >> >> This is useful on RHEL 9 and its clone distros where texlive-xecjk >> doesn't work at the moment due to a missing dependency [1]. >> "make pdfdocs" for non-CJK contents should work after removing >> texlive-xecjk. > In hindsight, I think this qualifies as a stable material. > Let me append a couple of tags. > >> >> Link: [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086254 >> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: 398f7abdcb7e ("docs: pdfdocs: Pull LaTeX preamble part out of conf.py") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.18+ > > Jon, it's up to you whether this one is destined for v6.0-rcX or > for the next merge window. It has no dependency on patches 1/3 > and 2/3. OK, I've gone ahead and applied it with those tags. Thanks, jon
