Hi Jon, On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 17:53:57 +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On distros whose texlive packaging is fine-grained, texlive-xecjk > can be installed/removed independently of other texlive packages. > Conditionally loading xeCJK depending only on the existence of the > "Noto Sans CJK SC" font might end up in xelatex error of > "xeCJK.sty not found!". > > Improve the situation by testing existence of xeCJK.sty before > loading it. > > This is useful on RHEL 9 and its clone distros where texlive-xecjk > doesn't work at the moment due to a missing dependency [1]. > "make pdfdocs" for non-CJK contents should work after removing > texlive-xecjk. In hindsight, I think this qualifies as a stable material. Let me append a couple of tags. > > Link: [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086254 > Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 398f7abdcb7e ("docs: pdfdocs: Pull LaTeX preamble part out of conf.py") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.18+ Jon, it's up to you whether this one is destined for v6.0-rcX or for the next merge window. It has no dependency on patches 1/3 and 2/3. Thanks, Akira
