On 01/28/2013 10:01 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:39:53PM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> It is expected that board files would have:
>> static unsigned int bl_levels[] = { 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, };
>>
>> static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data bl_data = {
>> .levels = bl_levels,
>> .max_brightness = ARRAY_SIZE(bl_levels),
>> .dft_brightness = 4,
>> .pwm_period_ns = 7812500,
>> };
>>
>> In this case the max_brightness would be out of range in the levels array.
>> Decrement the received max_brightness in every case (DT or non DT) when the
>> levels has been provided.
>
> What's wrong with specifying .max_brightness = ARRAY_SIZE(bl_levels) - 1
> instead?
There is nothing wrong with that either but IMHO it is more natural for board
files to use just ARRAY_SIZE(bl_levels). In this way the handling of
data->max_brightness among non DT and DT booted kernel is more uniform in the
driver itself.
Right now all board files are using only the .max_brightness to specify the
maximum value, I could not find any users of .levels in the kernel.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
