Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm_backlight: Fix PWM levels support in non DT case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:39:53PM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> It is expected that board files would have:
> static unsigned int bl_levels[] = { 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, };
> 
> static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data bl_data = {
> 	.levels = bl_levels,
> 	.max_brightness = ARRAY_SIZE(bl_levels),
> 	.dft_brightness = 4,
> 	.pwm_period_ns = 7812500,
> };
> 
> In this case the max_brightness would be out of range in the levels array.
> Decrement the received max_brightness in every case (DT or non DT) when the
> levels has been provided.

What's wrong with specifying .max_brightness = ARRAY_SIZE(bl_levels) - 1
instead?

Thierry

Attachment: pgpTCcBoRDLDg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux