Re: [PATCH] crypto: scatterwalk - Change scatterwalk_next calling convention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:18:15AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> 
> Do you have a usage scenario where this struct is embedded into
> something bigger and bloat is a real concern?

That's exactly what happens to struct skcipher_walk.  This patch adds two
redundant pointers to it.  Yes it's allocated on the stack, but it's still not a
great result.

- Eric




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux