On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 16:44 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > So get_vdso_data() + VVAR_LOONGARCH_PAGES_START * PAGE_SIZE should have > > already "jumped over" the time-ns vdso data. > > Oh good. Thanks for checking. So it sounds like there's just Huacai's > set of comments and we're good. Both Huacai and I (we've discussed a little off the list) think it seems more natural to separate the implementation and the self test into two patches. Do you think it's acceptable? If not we can live with one consolidated patch though. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
