On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:34:47AM +0200, Marek Behún wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:47:10 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 08:51:23PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote: ... > > For what purpose? I don't see drivers doing that. Are you expecting that > > the same IRQ mapping will be reused for something else? Can you elaborate > > how? (I can imagine one theoretical / weird case how to achieve that, > > but impractical.) > > I do a lot of binding/unbinding of that driver. I was under the > impression that all resources should be dropped on driver unbind. > > > Besides above, this is asymmetrical call to gpiod_to_irq(). If we really care > > about this, it should be provided by GPIO library. > > Something like the following? Not needed. IRQ mappings are per domain, and GPIO chip has its own associated with the respective lifetime, AFAIU when you remove the GPIO chip, all mappings will be disposed (as I pointed out in previous mail). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
