On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 04:15:10PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: > Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: > >> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: > >> >> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> This is Andy's kernel mode vector V2 series [1], with my BLAKE2s > >> >> AVX-512-to-RISC-V translation patch appended. > >> >> > >> >> I've tagged it as RFC, since Andy's series is still not in-tree yet. > >> >> > >> >> It's a first step towards a Vector aided Wireguard! ;-) > >> > > >> > This has the same problems as Andy's stuff & doesn't build properly for the > >> > automation. What is the plan between yourself and Andy for submitting a > >> > version of the in-kernel vector support that passes build testing? > >> > >> I'll synch up with Andy! I'm not even sure the blake2s patch should part > >> of the "in-kernel vector" series at all. > > > > The in-kernel vector stuff should come with a user, otherwise it's dead > > code :) > > Sure, just so we're on the same page; Patch 3 (Vector XOR) is a user > from my perspective, no? D'oh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
