Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] RISC-V BLAKE2s Vector implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> >> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> This is Andy's kernel mode vector V2 series [1], with my BLAKE2s
> >> AVX-512-to-RISC-V translation patch appended.
> >> 
> >> I've tagged it as RFC, since Andy's series is still not in-tree yet.
> >> 
> >> It's a first step towards a Vector aided Wireguard! ;-)
> >
> > This has the same problems as Andy's stuff & doesn't build properly for the
> > automation. What is the plan between yourself and Andy for submitting a
> > version of the in-kernel vector support that passes build testing?
> 
> I'll synch up with Andy! I'm not even sure the blake2s patch should part
> of the "in-kernel vector" series at all.

The in-kernel vector stuff should come with a user, otherwise it's dead
code :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux