Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 02:59:30PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: >> Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote: >> >> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> This is Andy's kernel mode vector V2 series [1], with my BLAKE2s >> >> AVX-512-to-RISC-V translation patch appended. >> >> >> >> I've tagged it as RFC, since Andy's series is still not in-tree yet. >> >> >> >> It's a first step towards a Vector aided Wireguard! ;-) >> > >> > This has the same problems as Andy's stuff & doesn't build properly for the >> > automation. What is the plan between yourself and Andy for submitting a >> > version of the in-kernel vector support that passes build testing? >> >> I'll synch up with Andy! I'm not even sure the blake2s patch should part >> of the "in-kernel vector" series at all. > > The in-kernel vector stuff should come with a user, otherwise it's dead > code :) Sure, just so we're on the same page; Patch 3 (Vector XOR) is a user from my perspective, no?
