On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 11:45, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:43:40AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > That would be an option, but since we basically already have our own > > local 'EXPERT' option when it comes to crypto testing, I thought I'd > > use that instead. > > Well that creates a loop and changing the select into a dependency > may confuse non-expert users who actually want to use this. > > So I think using EXPERT is the way to go. > Fair enough.
