On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:53:22AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It should work the same on larger systems, the solution scales > naturally to lots of sockets. It's not clear it'll help enough on systems > with a lot more cores per socket, like a Xeon Phi. But for now it should > be good enough. One change which I'm currently making is to use kmalloc_node() instead of kmalloc() for the per-NUMA node, and I suspect *that* is going to make a quite a lot of different on those systems where the ratio of remote to local memory access times is larger (as I assume it probably would be on really big systems). - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
