On 05/18/2016 08:57 AM, Gary R Hook wrote: > Yes, thank you. After spending more time wandering through rsa.c & rsa_helper.c > I have come to realize that I have been laboring under a paradigm imposed by > my implementation requirements. Now that I have that cleared up, the answer to > my question it self-evident.Although I'm still not clear on why testmgr feels > the need to create a SGL table with an empty second element (for the existing > tests), rather than a single SGL. Because the role of testmgr is to test different scenarios like more than one entry in an sgl, etc. Thanks, -- TS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
