On 04/10/2015 04:50 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:46:04 schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
Hi Daniel,
On 04/10/2015 04:36 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:26:00 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
...
I suspected a problem in how volatile with non-present output args could
be different, but this seems not to be the case.
I would contact llvm/clang mailing list and ask. Maybe there is a
problem? It seems kind of strange to me...
+1
Do you really think this is a compiler issue?
If clang/LLVM advertises "GCC compatibility", then this would
certainly be a different behavior.
As you wish. I will contact the clang folks. As the proposed fix is not super
urgend, I think we can leave it until I got word from clang.
Okay, that would be good, please let us know.
I believe there's certainly effort in the direction of an official
kernel clang/LLVM support, but not officially supported yet. If we
could get some clarification on the issue, even better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
