Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:46:04 schrieb Daniel Borkmann: Hi Daniel, >On 04/10/2015 04:36 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote: >> Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:26:00 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa: >... > >>> I suspected a problem in how volatile with non-present output args could >>> be different, but this seems not to be the case. >>> >>> I would contact llvm/clang mailing list and ask. Maybe there is a >>> problem? It seems kind of strange to me... > >+1 > >> Do you really think this is a compiler issue? > >If clang/LLVM advertises "GCC compatibility", then this would >certainly be a different behavior. As you wish. I will contact the clang folks. As the proposed fix is not super urgend, I think we can leave it until I got word from clang. >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
