On 04/10/2015 04:36 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:26:00 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
...
I suspected a problem in how volatile with non-present output args could be different, but this seems not to be the case. I would contact llvm/clang mailing list and ask. Maybe there is a problem? It seems kind of strange to me...
+1
Do you really think this is a compiler issue?
If clang/LLVM advertises "GCC compatibility", then this would certainly be a different behavior. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
