Re: [PATCH] crypto: algif - Mark sgl end at the end of data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/01/2014 07:00 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> As I said the two are arbitrary and we don't place any restrictions
> on them at all (apart from the fact that the TX length in bytes must
> obviously be longer than the RX bytes).
> 
> So you can have a 1-element TX list with a multi-element RX list.

Ok, I can look at the data, but do you think the idea with marking the
end of data in TX sgl is worthwhile or should I just forget about it.
Another question is - is an sgl with lots of empty buffers a valid input
from an algorithm implementation point of view?
Thanks,
Tadeusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux