Hi Herbert, On 12/01/2014 06:40 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: >> + nents = sg_nents(ctx->rsgl.sg); >> > + sg_mark_end(&sg[nents - 1]); > Huh? You're getting nents from the RX side and using it to mark > the TX side? This makes no sense because RX may have no relationship > whatsoever with TX. Yes, but there shouldn't be more nents with data to be processed in TX than nents in RX and in most cases they should be equal. Or am I missing something? Thanks, Tadeusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
